Aesop, Aristotle, and Animals

   In Edward Clayton's essay he discusses the importance of fables and there uses in both ancient and modern times.  Clayton also presents the idea that animals are used in fables because humans are indeed animals.  Although we are animals as well, Clayton believes it is our superiority and our ability to advance ourselves is what sets us apart from animals.
  Fables are described as being significant parts of Athenian culture.  Clayton tells the story of Demades to show that fables were considered to be respectable pieces of conversation in a political environment. Athenians believed that fables were important enough to speak about and this proves their validity. 
   Humans are animals by nature.  Humans can be seen as being superior to animals because we can advance ourselves in times of need.  Fables use animals in part because we are all animalistic in nature.  The fables we read often have strong animals dominating weaker animals.   This in my opinion is true with humans.  We often see stronger and smarter people doing better for themselves while weaker and less intelligent people tend to suffer.  The use of animals helps us relate to the lesson being taught. Aristotle's main difference between humans and animals is humans need for reasoning.  This key difference separates us.  Humans relate to the animals in fables because the traits these animals have are human traits.
   I believe that Clayton's analysis of fables and their use of animals was spot on.  He worked to give credibility to fables. Fables can be seen as stories for children, but on the contrary can be very valuable lessons.  Fables often use animals as the main characters so humans can relate to the lessons learned.  Clayton also gives justifications for the use of animals.  He also explains the similarities and differences between humans and animals.